↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative petrological evidence for the origin of K-feldspar megacrysts in dacites from Taapaca volcano, Chile

Overview of attention for article published in Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative petrological evidence for the origin of K-feldspar megacrysts in dacites from Taapaca volcano, Chile
Published in
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00410-011-0620-9
Authors

Michael D. Higgins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#185
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,501
of 110,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.