| Title |
Über das Zeitgedächtnis der Bienen
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 1929
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00340159 |
| Authors |
Ingeborg Beling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 35% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,138,739
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#181
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them