| Title |
Nortriptyline for pain in knee osteoarthritis in general practice: a double blind randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0797 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben Hudson, Jonathan A Williman, Lisa K Stamp, John S Alchin, Gary J Hooper, Dee Mangin, Bronwyn F Lenox Thompson, Les Toop |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 3 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,301,148
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,116
of 4,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,836
of 537,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#32
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.