| Title |
The implementation of a community-based aerobic walking program for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA): a knowledge translation (KT) randomized controlled trial (RCT): Part I: The Uptake of the Ottawa Panel clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-871 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucie Brosseau, George A Wells, Glen P Kenny, Robert Reid, Andreas Maetzel, Peter Tugwell, Maria Huijbregts, Carolyn McCullough, Gino De Angelis, Lily Chen |
| Abstract |
The implementation of evidence based clinical practice guidelines on self-management interventions to patients with chronic diseases is a complex process. A multifaceted strategy may offer an effective knowledge translation (KT) intervention to promote knowledge uptake and improve adherence in an effective walking program based on the Ottawa Panel Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guidelines among individuals with moderate osteoarthritis (OA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,194,399
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,435
of 14,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,911
of 174,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#104
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.