↓ Skip to main content

Spectrum of LMX1B mutations: from nail–patella syndrome to isolated nephropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Spectrum of LMX1B mutations: from nail–patella syndrome to isolated nephropathy
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00467-016-3462-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yutaka Harita, Sachiko Kitanaka, Tsuyoshi Isojima, Akira Ashida, Motoshi Hattori

Abstract

Nail-patella syndrome (NPS) is an autosomal-dominant disease caused by LMX1B mutations and is characterized by dysplastic nails, absent or hypoplastic patellae, elbow dysplasia, and iliac horns. Renal involvement is the major determinant of the prognosis for NPS. Patients often present with varying degrees of proteinuria or hematuria, and can occasionally progress to chronic renal failure. Recent genetic analysis has found that some mutations in the homeodomain of LMX1B cause isolated nephropathy without nail, patellar or skeletal abnormality (LMX1B-associated nephropathy). The classic term "nail-patella syndrome" would not represent disease conditions in these cases. This review provides an overview of NPS, and highlights the molecular genetics of NPS nephropathy and LMX1B-associated nephropathy. Our current understanding of LMX1B function in the pathogenesis of NPS and LMX1B-associated nephropathy is also presented, and its downstream regulatory networks discussed. This recent progress provides insights that help to define potential targeted therapeutic strategies for LMX1B-associated diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Neuroscience 3 11%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,739,763
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#952
of 3,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,595
of 364,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#15
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,553 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.