↓ Skip to main content

A Simplified Method to Distinguish Farmed (Salmo salar) from Wild Salmon: Fatty Acid Ratios Versus Astaxanthin Chiral Isomers

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
A Simplified Method to Distinguish Farmed (Salmo salar) from Wild Salmon: Fatty Acid Ratios Versus Astaxanthin Chiral Isomers
Published in
Lipids, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11745-009-3294-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Andrew Megdal, Neal A. Craft, Garry J. Handelman

Abstract

Mislabeling of farmed and wild salmon sold in markets has been reported. Since the fatty acid content of fish may influence human health and thus consumer behavior, a simplified method to identify wild and farmed salmon is necessary. Several studies have demonstrated differences in lipid profiles between farmed and wild salmon but no data exists validating these differences with government-approved methods to accurately identify the origin of these fish. Current methods are both expensive and complicated, using highly specialized equipment not commonly available. Therefore, we developed a testing protocol using gas chromatography (GC), to determine the origin of salmon using fatty acid profiles. We also compared the GC method with the currently approved FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) technique that uses analysis of carotenoid optical isomers and found 100% agreement. Statistical validation (n = 30) was obtained showing elevated 18:2n-6 (z = 4.56; P = 0.0001) and decreased 20:1n-9 (z = 1.79; P = 0.07) in farmed samples. The method is suitable for wide adaptation because fatty acid methyl ester analysis is a well-established procedure in labs that conduct analysis of lipid composition and food constituents. GC analysis for determining the origin of North American salmon compared favorably with the astaxanthin isomer technique used by the FDA and showed that the fatty acid 18:2n-6 was the key indicator associated with the origin of these salmon.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 30%
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Chemistry 9 11%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Lipids
#1,770
of 1,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,077
of 96,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.