| Title |
National Bone Health Alliance Bone Turnover Marker Project: current practices and the need for US harmonization, standardization, and common reference ranges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-012-2049-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Bauer, J. Krege, N. Lane, E. Leary, C. Libanati, P. Miller, G. Myers, S. Silverman, H. W. Vesper, D. Lee, M. Payette, S. Randall |
| Abstract |
This position paper reviews how the National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) will execute a project to help assure health professionals of the clinical utility of bone turnover markers; the current clinical approaches concerning osteoporosis and the status and use of bone turnover markers in the USA; the rationale for focusing this effort around two specific bone turnover markers; the need to standardize bone marker sample collection procedures, reference ranges, and bone turnover marker assays in clinical laboratories; and the importance of harmonization for future research of bone turnover markers. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 26% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,350,211
of 24,643,522 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#386
of 3,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,383
of 168,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,643,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.