↓ Skip to main content

Axillary reverse mapping in axillary surgery for breast cancer: an update of the current status

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Axillary reverse mapping in axillary surgery for breast cancer: an update of the current status
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10549-016-3920-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martinus A. Beek, Paul D. Gobardhan, Ernst J. P. Schoenmaeckers, Elisabeth G. Klompenhouwer, Harm J. T. Rutten, Adri C. Voogd, Ernest J. T. Luiten

Abstract

Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique by which the lymphatic drainage of the upper extremity that traverses the axillary region can be differentiated from the lymphatic drainage of the breast during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Adding this procedure to ALND may reduce upper extremity lymphedema by preserving upper extremity drainage. This review of the current literature on the ARM procedure discusses the feasibility, safety and relevance of this technique. A PubMed literature search was performed until 12 August 2015. A total of 31 studies were included in this review. The studies indicated that the ARM procedure adequately identifies the upper extremity lymph nodes and lymphatics in the axillary basin using blue dye or fluorescence. Preservation of ARM lymph nodes and corresponding lymphatics was proven to be oncologically safe in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with metastatic lymph node involvement in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) who are advised to undergo a completion ALND. The ARM procedure is technically feasible with a high visualisation rate using blue dye or fluorescence. ALND combined with ARM can be regarded as a promising surgical refinement in order to reduce the incidence of upper extremity lymphedema in selected groups of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,653,514
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#867
of 4,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,533
of 364,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#21
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.