You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Re-imagining the ‘social’ in the nutrition sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Nutrition, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980011001297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Schubert, Danielle Gallegos, Wendy Foley, Claire Harrison |
| Abstract |
In response to The New Nutrition Science Project's Giessen Declaration, we provide here a case for a more fully described and integrated 'social' dimension within the nutrition sciences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,253,344
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Nutrition
#2,789
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,671
of 115,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Nutrition
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.