| Title |
Effect of a multifactorial interdisciplinary intervention on mobility-related disability in frail older people: randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola Fairhall, Catherine Sherrington, Susan E Kurrle, Stephen R Lord, Keri Lockwood, Ian D Cameron |
| Abstract |
Interventions that enhance mobility in frail older people are needed to maintain health and independence, yet definitive evidence of effective interventions is lacking. Our objective was to assess the impact of a multifactorial intervention on mobility-related disability in frail older people. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 18% |
| Researcher | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,116,459
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,917
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,235
of 196,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#23
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.