↓ Skip to main content

The significant other: splicing by the minor spliceosome

Overview of attention for article published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The significant other: splicing by the minor spliceosome
Published in
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/wrna.1141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janne J. Turunen, Elina H. Niemelä, Bhupendra Verma, Mikko J. Frilander

Abstract

The removal of non-coding sequences, introns, from the mRNA precursors is an essential step in eukaryotic gene expression. U12-type introns are a minor subgroup of introns, distinct from the major or U2-type introns. U12-type introns are present in most eukaryotes but only account for less than 0.5% of all introns in any given genome. They are processed by a specific U12-dependent spliceosome, which is similar to, but distinct from, the major spliceosome. U12-type introns are spliced somewhat less efficiently than the major introns, and it is believed that this limits the expression of the genes containing such introns. Recent findings on the role of U12-dependent splicing in development and human disease have shown that it can also affect multiple cellular processes not directly related to the functions of the host genes of U12-type introns. At the same time, advances in understanding the regulation and phylogenetic distribution of the minor spliceosome are starting to shed light on how the U12-type introns and the minor spliceosome may have evolved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 432 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 29%
Student > Master 65 15%
Researcher 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 75 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 155 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 32%
Neuroscience 15 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 3%
Chemistry 10 2%
Other 27 6%
Unknown 83 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA
#172
of 684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,037
of 195,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.