| Title |
Pneumatic pumping in centrifugal microfluidic platforms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10404-010-0571-x |
| Authors |
Robert Gorkin, Liviu Clime, Marc Madou, Horacio Kido |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 30% |
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 52 | 46% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,288,565
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#25
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,135
of 94,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.