You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision-Making in Collaborative Governance Networks: Pathways to Input and Throughput Legitimacy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muaa044 |
| Authors |
Jennifer E Mosley, Jade Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 23 | 64% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 32 | 30% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,608,573
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#78
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,298
of 437,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.