↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Anxiety in Youth with Learning Disabilities: Reliability and Validity of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC)

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Measuring Anxiety in Youth with Learning Disabilities: Reliability and Validity of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC)
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10578-010-0182-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas S. Thaler, Ellie Kazemi, Jeffrey J. Wood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 45%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,359
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#577
of 917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,591
of 95,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.