| Title |
Supervisors’ Perception of the Factors Influencing the Return to Work of Workers with Common Mental Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-011-9316-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre Lemieux, Marie-José Durand, Quan Nha Hong |
| Abstract |
Over the last decade, common mental disorders have become an area of major concern in the field of work disability prevention due to the rising number of claims, costs, and impacts on quality of life. It has been shown that supervisory behavior influences return-to-work outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the perception held by supervisors involved in work disability management, of the factors facilitating or hindering the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,382,382
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#231
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,064
of 112,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.