Title |
Systematic review of amifostine for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00520-012-1613-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis, Triantafyllia Sarri, Joanne Bowen, Mario Di Palma, Vassilios E. Kouloulias, Pasquale Niscola, Dorothea Riesenbeck, Monique Stokman, Wim Tissing, Eric Yeoh, Sharon Elad, Rajesh V. Lalla, For The Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to review the available literature from 1966 until December 31, 2010 and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of amifostine for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 26 | 30% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 43% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,253,344
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,051
of 4,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,257
of 172,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#30
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.