You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COLD-PCR and Innovative Microarray Substrates for Detecting and Genotyping MPL Exon 10 W515 Substitutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Chemistry, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1373/clinchem.2012.192708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela Brisci, Francesco Damin, Daniela Pietra, Silvia Galbiati, Sabrina Boggi, Ilaria Casetti, Elisa Rumi, Marcella Chiari, Mario Cazzola, Maurizio Ferrari, Laura Cremonesi |
| Abstract |
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Somatic mutations in exon 10 of the MPL (myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene) gene, mainly substitutions encoding W515 variants, have recently been described in a minority of patients with ET or PMF. We optimized analytically sensitive methods for detecting and genotyping MPL variants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#6,748
of 7,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,105
of 277,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#47
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.