↓ Skip to main content

Th9 cells promote antitumor immune responses in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
288 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Th9 cells promote antitumor immune responses in vivo
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, October 2012
DOI 10.1172/jci65459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Lu, Sungyoul Hong, Haiyan Li, Jungsun Park, Bangxing Hong, Lijuan Wang, Yuhuan Zheng, Zhiqiang Liu, Jingda Xu, Jin He, Jing Yang, Jianfei Qian, Qing Yi

Abstract

Th9 cells are a subset of CD4+ Th cells that produce the pleiotropic cytokine IL-9. IL-9/Th9 can function as both positive and negative regulators of immune response, but the role of IL-9/Th9 in tumor immunity is unknown. We examined the role of IL-9/Th9 in a model of pulmonary melanoma in mice. Lack of IL-9 enhanced tumor growth, while tumor-specific Th9 cell treatment promoted stronger antitumor responses in both prophylactic and therapeutic models. Th9 cells also elicited strong host antitumor CD8+ CTL responses by promoting Ccl20/Ccr6-dependent recruitment of DCs to the tumor tissues. Subsequent tumor antigen delivery to the draining LN resulted in CD8+ T cell priming. In agreement with this model, Ccr6 deficiency abrogated the Th9 cell-mediated antitumor response. Our data suggest a distinct role for tumor-specific Th9 cells in provoking CD8+ CTL-mediated antitumor immunity and indicate that Th9 cell-based cancer immunotherapy may be a promising therapeutic approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Master 31 16%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 13%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,088,938
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#2,699
of 17,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,233
of 192,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#34
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.