↓ Skip to main content

Vision in Drosophila: Seeing the World Through a Model's Eyes

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Entomology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vision in Drosophila: Seeing the World Through a Model's Eyes
Published in
Annual Review of Entomology, September 2012
DOI 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelique Paulk, S. Sean Millard, Bruno van Swinderen

Abstract

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been used for decades as a genetic model for unraveling mechanisms of development and behavior. In order to efficiently assign gene functions to cellular and behavioral processes, early measures were often necessarily simple. Much of what is known of developmental pathways was based on disrupting highly regular structures, such as patterns of cells in the eye. Similarly, reliable visual behaviors such as phototaxis and motion responses provided a solid foundation for dissecting vision. Researchers have recently begun to examine how this model organism responds to more complex or naturalistic stimuli by designing novel paradigms that more closely mimic visual behavior in the wild. Alongside these advances, the development of brain-recording strategies allied with novel genetic tools has brought about a new era of Drosophila vision research where neuronal activity can be related to behavior in the natural world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 221 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 28%
Researcher 48 20%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Master 28 12%
Other 9 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 27 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 45%
Neuroscience 38 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Psychology 14 6%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 34 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,227,651
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Entomology
#340
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,375
of 190,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Entomology
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.