↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Efficacy and safety of the “mother’s kiss” technique: a systematic review of case reports and case series

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of the “mother’s kiss” technique: a systematic review of case reports and case series
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2012
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.111864
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Cook, Martin Burton, Paul Glasziou

Abstract

Foreign bodies lodged in the nasal cavity are a common problem in children, and their removal can be challenging. The published studies relating to the "mother's kiss" all take the form of case reports and case series. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Other 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 12 30%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 57%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#460,627
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#800
of 9,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,425
of 193,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#7
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.