↓ Skip to main content

The eutrophic rhytidoplasty

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plastic Surgery, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The eutrophic rhytidoplasty
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00238-012-0767-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Daher, Alan Rodriguez Muñiz

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients submitted to rhytidectomy usually relay their desire for briefer surgical procedures and a shorter post-operative period with faster recovery. In view of this, a technique in which the skin of the cervico-mandibular region is not undermined but only detached by blunt dissection was developed. METHODS: A retrospective study of the senior author's experience in eutrophic rhytidoplasty (EUR), the technique proposed herein, for facial rejuvenation was conducted. Patients submitted to EUR over a 10-year period were included in this study. A total of 224 interventions were performed. The procedure consists of using subdermal tunneling, performed with a cannula along the neck region and the midface area (combined or not with liposuction in certain areas, as needed), thus preserving nervous and vascular connections. The conventional skin undermining is minimal, just 4 cm around the auricular pavilion. Data were collected from the patients' medical records at Interclínica-Centroplástica Clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. RESULTS: Due to the skin eutrophic conditions, the operated patients, using the EUR technique, presented promising esthetical results. The mean rate of complications associated with the proposed technique was 1.7 %. The author found that this technique offers very promising results, a fact evidenced by the lower rate of complications among patients submitted to it. CONCLUSIONS: The EUR is a reliable option for facial rejuvenation due to the fact that it is less invasive, with a low morbidity and rate of complications. Its surgical time is reduced by 50 %, it has a shorter down-time, and yields natural results. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 64%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,108,290
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#77
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,950
of 173,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.