↓ Skip to main content

札幌近傍ピット其他古跡ノ事

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Anthropological Society, February 1886
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
札幌近傍ピット其他古跡ノ事
Published in
Bulletin of the Anthropological Society, February 1886
DOI 10.14844/ase1886a.1.1_8
Authors

渡瀬 荘三郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Anthropological Society
#1
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55
of 1,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Anthropological Society
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them