You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of information about different absolute benefits and harms on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A think-aloud study and online randomised experiment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0246991 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliet A. Usher-Smith, Katie M. Mills, Christiane Riedinger, Catherine L. Saunders, Lise M. Helsingen, Lyubov Lytvyn, Maaike Buskermolen, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Michael Bretthauer, Gordon Guyatt, Simon J. Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,252,372
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#82,564
of 215,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,206
of 429,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,055
of 2,898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.