↓ Skip to main content

Cue Reactivity in Active Pathological, Abstinent Pathological, and Regular Gamblers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Cue Reactivity in Active Pathological, Abstinent Pathological, and Regular Gamblers
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10899-009-9146-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruthlyn Sodano, Edelgard Wulfert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 44%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,359
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#560
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,288
of 111,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.