↓ Skip to main content

Entering and Exiting the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap: Role of Comorbidities and Demographics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Entering and Exiting the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap: Role of Comorbidities and Demographics
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1300-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan L. Ettner, Neil Steers, O. Kenrik Duru, Norman Turk, Elaine Quiter, Julie Schmittdiel, Carol M. Mangione

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Psychology 6 9%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,703
of 96,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#33
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.