↓ Skip to main content

電子政府の問題点の類型化――なぜ電子政府はうまく進まないのか――

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Policy Studies, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
電子政府の問題点の類型化――なぜ電子政府はうまく進まないのか――
Published in
Journal of Public Policy Studies, December 2010
DOI 10.32202/publicpolicystudies.10.0_94
Authors

藤本 吉則

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Policy Studies
#20
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,457
of 190,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Policy Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them