You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CCTT-Core Split-Winding Integrated Magnetic for High-Power DC–DC Converters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1109/tpel.2013.2240394 |
| Authors |
Kevin J. Hartnett, John G. Hayes, Michael G. Egan, Marek S. Rylko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 33% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 80% |
| Energy | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,647,369
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
#813
of 3,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,024
of 214,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.