| Title |
How a Navigation Channel Contributed to Most of the Flooding of New Orleans During Hurricane Katrina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Organization Review, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11115-009-0093-8 |
| Authors |
Ivor Ll. van Heerden, G. Paul Kemp, Robert Bea, Gary Shaffer, John Day, Chad Morris, Duncan Fitzgerald, Andrew Milanes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,486,178
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Public Organization Review
#28
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,698
of 93,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Organization Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.