↓ Skip to main content

A shift in the salt bridge interaction of residues D620 and E621 mediates the constitutive activation of Jak2-H538Q/K539L

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
A shift in the salt bridge interaction of residues D620 and E621 mediates the constitutive activation of Jak2-H538Q/K539L
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11010-012-1326-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavitha Gnanasambandan, Andrew T. Magis, Peter P. Sayeski

Abstract

Jak2 mutations in the exon 14 and exon 12 regions that cause constitutive activation have been associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms. We have previously shown that a pi stacking interaction between F617 and F595 is important for the constitutive activation of Jak2-V617F (Gnanasambandan et al., Biochemistry 49:9972-9984, 2010). Here, using a combination of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and in vitro mutagenesis, we studied the molecular mechanism for the constitutive activation of the Jak2 exon 12 mutation, H538Q/K539L. The activation levels of Jak2-H538Q/K539L were found to be similar to that of Jak2-V617F, and Jak2-H538Q/K539L/V617F. Data from MD simulations indicated a shift in the salt bridge interactions of D620 and E621 with K539 in Jak2-WT to R541 in Jak2-H538Q/K539L. When compared to Jak2-WT, K539A mutation resulted in increased activation, while K539D or K539E mutations diminished Jak2 activation by 50 %. In the context of Jak2-H538Q/K539L, R541A mutation reduced its activation by 50 %, while R541D and R541E mutations returned its activation levels to that of Jak2-WT. Collectively, these results indicate that a shift in the salt bridge interaction of D620 and E621 with K539 in Jak2-WT to R541 in Jak2-H538Q/K539L is critical for constitutive activation of this Jak2 exon 12 mutant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Chemistry 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1,792
of 2,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,350
of 163,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.