| Title |
Patient Satisfaction of Female and Male Users of Veterans Health Administration Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00371.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven M. Wright, Thomas Craig, Stacey Campbell, Jim Schaefer, Charles Humble |
| Abstract |
To compare patient satisfaction of male and female users of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 29% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2012.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,392
of 8,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,921
of 84,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.