You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tumour gene expression signature in primary melanoma predicts long-term outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-021-21207-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manik Garg, Dominique-Laurent Couturier, Jérémie Nsengimana, Nuno A. Fonseca, Matthew Wongchenko, Yibing Yan, Martin Lauss, Göran B. Jönsson, Julia Newton-Bishop, Christine Parkinson, Mark R. Middleton, D. Timothy Bishop, Sarah McDonald, Nikki Stefanos, John Tadross, Ismael A. Vergara, Serigne Lo, Felicity Newell, James S. Wilmott, John F. Thompson, Georgina V. Long, Richard A. Scolyer, Pippa Corrie, David J. Adams, Alvis Brazma, Roy Rabbie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#609,689
of 23,784,266 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,599
of 49,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,246
of 422,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#499
of 1,954 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,784,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,954 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.