| Title |
The use of household cleaning products during pregnancy and lower respiratory tract infections and wheezing during early life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-012-0417-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lidia Casas, Jan Paul Zock, Anne Elie Carsin, Ana Fernandez-Somoano, Ana Esplugues, Loreto Santa-Marina, Adonina Tardón, Ferran Ballester, Mikel Basterrechea, Jordi Sunyer |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the effects of household use of cleaning products during pregnancy on infant wheezing and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,839,600
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#197
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,117
of 191,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.