| Title |
Natural sweet macromolecules: how sweet proteins work
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00018-006-6077-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. A. Temussi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 13% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,089,291
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#505
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,539
of 66,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.