You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-term changes in kelp forests in an inner basin of the Salish Sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0229703 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen D. Berry, Thomas F. Mumford, Bart Christiaen, Pete Dowty, Max Calloway, Lisa Ferrier, Eric E. Grossman, Nathan R. VanArendonk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 36% |
| Canada | 6 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 58% |
| Scientists | 19 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#332,428
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,716
of 224,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,097
of 458,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#107
of 2,934 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,934 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.