Title |
A comparative analysis of the factors promoting deer invasion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-012-0228-7 |
Authors |
Richard Fautley, Tim Coulson, Vincent Savolainen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 25% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 59% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 18% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#2,053
of 2,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,183
of 163,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.