You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.12055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica R. Sushinsky, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Hugh P. Possingham, Tony K. Gill, Richard A. Fuller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 28% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 72% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 459 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 98 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 69 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 12% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 17% |
| Unknown | 73 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 175 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 155 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Design | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Unknown | 97 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#958,645
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#1,170
of 6,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,496
of 200,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#5
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.