↓ Skip to main content

Data Mining the Intellectual Revival of ‘Catastrophic’ Mother Nature

Overview of attention for article published in Foundations of Science, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Data Mining the Intellectual Revival of ‘Catastrophic’ Mother Nature
Published in
Foundations of Science, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10699-012-9299-2
Authors

Nick Marriner, Christophe Morhange

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
France 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 14%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Science
#252
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,828
of 173,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Science
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.