You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
De novo mtDNA point mutations are common and have a low recurrence risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103876 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne C E H Sallevelt, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Alexandra T M Hendrickx, Debby M E I Hellebrekers, Irenaeus F M de Coo, Charlotte L Alston, Charlotte Knowles, Robert W Taylor, Robert McFarland, Hubert J M Smeets |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,685
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#2,665
of 3,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,501
of 383,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.