↓ Skip to main content

The Sun Health Research Institute Brain Donation Program: Description and Eexperience, 1987–2007

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Banking, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 286)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
The Sun Health Research Institute Brain Donation Program: Description and Eexperience, 1987–2007
Published in
Cell and Tissue Banking, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10561-008-9067-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas G. Beach, Lucia I. Sue, Douglas G. Walker, Alex E. Roher, LihFen Lue, Linda Vedders, Donald J. Connor, Marwan N. Sabbagh, Joseph Rogers

Abstract

The Brain Donation Program at Sun Health Research Institute has been in continual operation since 1987, with over 1000 brains banked. The population studied primarily resides in the retirement communities of northwest metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. The Institute is affiliated with Sun Health, a nonprofit community-owned and operated health care provider. Subjects are enrolled prospectively to allow standardized clinical assessments during life. Funding comes primarily from competitive grants. The Program has made short postmortem brain retrieval a priority, with a 2.75-h median postmortem interval for the entire collection. This maximizes the utility of the resource for molecular studies; frozen tissue from approximately 82% of all cases is suitable for RNA studies. Studies performed in-house have shown that, even with very short postmortem intervals, increasing delays in brain retrieval adversely affect RNA integrity and that cerebrospinal fluid pH increases with postmortem interval but does not predict tissue viability.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Neuroscience 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#1,306,857
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Banking
#4
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,063
of 81,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Banking
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them