↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
410 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00259-012-2247-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sugama Chicklore, Vicky Goh, Musib Siddique, Arunabha Roy, Paul K. Marsden, Gary J. R. Cook

Abstract

(18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) is now routinely used in oncological imaging for diagnosis and staging and increasingly to determine early response to treatment, often employing semiquantitative measures of lesion activity such as the standardized uptake value (SUV). However, the ability to predict the behaviour of a tumour in terms of future therapy response or prognosis using SUVs from a baseline scan prior to treatment is limited. It is recognized that medical images contain more useful information than may be perceived with the naked eye, leading to the field of "radiomics" whereby additional features can be extracted by computational postprocessing techniques. In recent years, evidence has slowly accumulated showing that parameters obtained by texture analysis of radiological images, reflecting the underlying spatial variation and heterogeneity of voxel intensities within a tumour, may yield additional predictive and prognostic information. It is hoped that measurement of these textural features may allow better tissue characterization as well as better stratification of treatment in clinical trials, or individualization of future cancer treatment in the clinic, than is possible with current imaging biomarkers. In this review we focus on the literature describing the emerging methods of texture analysis in (18)FDG PET/CT, as well as other imaging modalities, and how the measurement of spatial variation of voxel grey-scale intensity within an image may provide additional predictive and prognostic information, and postulate the underlying biological mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 320 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 25%
Researcher 57 17%
Student > Master 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 58 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 36%
Engineering 38 11%
Physics and Astronomy 36 11%
Computer Science 30 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 73 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,900,361
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#586
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,705
of 175,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.