↓ Skip to main content

Determination of heart rate variability with an electronic stethoscope

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Autonomic Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Determination of heart rate variability with an electronic stethoscope
Published in
Clinical Autonomic Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10286-012-0177-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haroon Kamran, Isaac Naggar, Francisca Oniyuke, Mercy Palomeque, Priya Chokshi, Louis Salciccioli, Mark Stewart, Jason M. Lazar

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) is widely used to characterize cardiac autonomic function by measuring beat-to-beat alterations in heart rate. Decreased HRV has been found predictive of worse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. HRV is determined from time intervals between QRS complexes recorded by electrocardiography (ECG) for several minutes to 24 h. Although cardiac auscultation with a stethoscope is performed routinely on patients, the human ear cannot detect heart sound time intervals. The electronic stethoscope digitally processes heart sounds, from which cardiac time intervals can be obtained.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 7%
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Psychology 3 10%
Sports and Recreations 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#630
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,416
of 171,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.