↓ Skip to main content

Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints?

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 908)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints?
Published in
Immunologic Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12026-016-8813-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. de Boer, M. Colaris, R. R. W. J. van der Hulst, J. W. Cohen Tervaert

Abstract

In this review, we present a critical review of the existing literature reflecting the results of explantation of silicone breast implants in patients with silicone-related complaints and/or autoimmune diseases. A literature search was performed to discuss the following issues: which clinical manifestations and autoimmune diseases improve after explantation, and what is the course of these complaints after explantation. Next, we reviewed studies in which the effect of explantation on laboratory findings observed in patients with silicone breast implants was studied, and lastly, we reviewed studies that described the effect of reconstruction of the breast with a new implant or autologous tissue after explantation. We calculated from the literature that explantation of the silicone breast improved silicone-related complaints in 75 % of the patients (469 of 622). In patients with autoimmune diseases, however, improvement was only infrequently observed without additional therapy with immunosuppressive therapy, i.e., in 16 % of the patients (3 of 18). The effect of explantation did not influence autoantibody testing such as ANA. We discuss several possibilities which could clarify why patients improve after explantation. Firstly, the inflammatory response could be reduced after explantation. Secondly, explantation of the implants may remove a nociceptive stimulus, which may be the causative factor for many complaints. Options for reconstruction of the explanted breast are autologous tissue and/or water-/hydrocellulose-filled breast implant. Unfortunately, in very few studies attention was paid to reconstructive possibilities. Therefore, no adequate conclusion regarding this issue could be drawn. In conclusion, explantation is useful for improvement of silicone-related complaints in 75 % of the patients, whereas in patients who developed autoimmune diseases improvement is only observed when explantation is combined with immunosuppressive therapy. In a patient with silicone-related complaints in which explantation is considered, the patient should be counseled for the different options of reconstruction after explantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Costa Rica 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 33 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 37 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#915,090
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#31
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,207
of 354,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.