You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A demographic ménage à trois: interactions between disturbances both amplify and dampen population dynamics of an endemic plant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ecology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.12642 |
| Authors |
Matthew R. Tye, Eric S. Menges, Carl Weekley, Pedro F. Quintana‐Ascencio, Roberto Salguero‐Gómez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 2500% |
| Researcher | 10 | 1000% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 800% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 500% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 300% |
| Other | 6 | 600% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 3500% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 1800% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 100% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 100% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 100% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,639,831
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#1,188
of 3,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,358
of 342,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#36
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.