↓ Skip to main content

Predictors for vascular cognitive impairment in stroke patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Predictors for vascular cognitive impairment in stroke patients
Published in
BMC Neurology, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12883-016-0638-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangliang Chen, Lihui Duan, Yunfei Han, Ling Tian, Qiliang Dai, Shang Wang, Ying Lin, Yunyun Xiong, Xinfeng Liu

Abstract

Around two thirds stroke patients may suffer from vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). Our previous study has validated the NINDS-CSN harmonization standard for VCI diagnosis in Chinese. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictors for VCI in Chinese post-stroke patients. We compared epidemiological, clinical, and neuroimaging data (number, size and location of acute infarcts and lacunes, severities of white matter hyperintensities and brain atrophy) between stroke patients with and without VCI. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were utilized to determine VCI predictors. Fifty-six consecutive patients (age, 63.8 ± 8.3 years; female, 37.5 %) were recruited at a mean interval of 7.1 months after stroke onset, and 31 (55.4 %) patients were diagnosed with VCI based on a validated 60-min neuropsychological battery. VCI patients were older (p = 0.023), less educated (p = 0.001), more likely to be female (p < 0.001), had a recurrent stroke (p = 0.028), and described higher apathy (p = 0.022) and worse pre-stroke cognition (p = 0.048) than cognitively normal patients. Lower educational level (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.750, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.573-0.981; p = 0.035), female sex (adjusted OR 8.288, 95 % CI, 1.522-45.113; p = 0.014), recurrent stroke (adjusted OR 11.327, 95 % CI, 1.335-96.130, p = 0.026), and global cortical atrophy (adjusted OR 5.730, 95 % CI, 1.128-29.101, p = 0.035) were independently associated with VCI in post-stroke patients. Lower education, female sex, recurrent stroke and global cortical atrophy were associated with VCI in Chinese stroke patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 31 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Neuroscience 12 12%
Psychology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 40 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,178
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#848
of 2,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,470
of 365,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#22
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.