↓ Skip to main content

The Rise of Eating Disorders in Japan: Issues of Culture and Limitations of the Model of “westernization”

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Rise of Eating Disorders in Japan: Issues of Culture and Limitations of the Model of “westernization”
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s11013-004-1066-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen M. Pike, Amy Borovoy

Abstract

As the first non-Western nation in contemporary history to become a major industrialized economic power, Japan is central to the debate on cultural relativism in psychiatric nosologies, and the study of eating disorders in Japan contributes to the complex discussion of the impact of culture and history on the experience, diagnosis and treatment of such disorders (R. Gordon 2001; Palmer 2001). Without question, the rise in eating disorders in Japan correlated with increasing industrialization, urbanization, and the fraying of traditional family forms following World War II. While the case of Japan confirms that the existence of eating disorders appears to be linked with these broader social transformations, it also points to the importance of specific cultural and historical factors in shaping the experience of eating disorders. In this article, we explore two particular dimensions of culture in contemporary Japan: (1) gender development and gender role expectations for females coming of age; and (2) beauty ideals and the role of weight and shape concerns in the etiology of eating disorders. Our analysis of these dimensions of culture, and the data accruing from empirical and qualitative research, reveal limitations to the model of "Westernization" and call for a more culturally sensitive search for meaning in both describing and explaining eating disorders in Japan today.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 22%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 30%
Social Sciences 33 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Arts and Humanities 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,812,430
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#511
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,935
of 153,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.