↓ Skip to main content

Sequestration of drugs in the circuit may lead to therapeutic failure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequestration of drugs in the circuit may lead to therapeutic failure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Published in
Critical Care, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11679
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiran Shekar, Jason A Roberts, Charles I Mcdonald, Stephanie Fisquet, Adrian G Barnett, Daniel V Mullany, Sussan Ghassabian, Steven C Wallis, Yoke L Fung, Maree T Smith, John F Fraser

Abstract

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a supportive therapy, with its success dependent on effective drug therapy that reverses the pathology and/or normalizes physiology. However, the circuit that sustains life can also sequester life-saving drugs, thereby compromising the role of ECMO as a temporary support device. This ex vivo study was designed to determine the degree of sequestration of commonly used antibiotics, sedatives and analgesics in ECMO circuits. METHODS: Four identical ECMO circuits were set up as per the standard protocol for adult patients on ECMO. The circuits were primed with crystalloid and albumin, followed by fresh human whole blood, and were maintained at a physiological pH and temperature for 24 hours. After baseline sampling, fentanyl, morphine, midazolam, meropenem and vancomycin were injected into the circuit at therapeutic concentrations. Equivalent doses of these drugs were also injected into four polyvinylchloride jars containing fresh human whole blood for drug stability testing. Serial blood samples were collected from the ECMO circuits and the controls over 24 hours and the concentrations of the study drugs were quantified using validated assays. RESULTS: Four hundred samples were analyzed. All study drugs, except meropenem, were chemically stable. The average drug recoveries from the ECMO circuits and the controls at 24 hours relative to baseline, respectively, were fentanyl 3% and 82%, morphine 103% and 97%, midazolam 13% and 100%, meropenem 20% and 42%, vancomycin 90% and 99%. There was a significant loss of fentanyl (p = 0.0005), midazolam (p = 0.01) and meropenem (p = 0.006) in the ECMO circuit at 24 hours. There was no significant circuit loss of vancomycin at 24 hours (p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Sequestration of drugs in the circuit has implications on both the choice and dosing of some drugs prescribed during ECMO. Sequestration of lipophilic drugs such as fentanyl and midazolam appears significant and may in part explain the increased dosing requirements of these drugs during ECMO. Meropenem sequestration is also problematic and these data support a more frequent administration during ECMO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 148 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 21%
Other 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Master 10 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 18%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,183,570
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,990
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,451
of 192,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.