↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric properties of the Affect Phobia Test

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric properties of the Affect Phobia Test
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/sjop.12308
Pubmed ID
Authors

My Frankl, Björn Philips, Lene Berggraf, Pål Ulvenes, Robert Johansson, Peter Wennberg

Abstract

The aim of this study was to make the first evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Affect Phobia Test, using the Swedish translation - a test developed to screen the ability to experience, express and regulate emotions. Data was collected from a clinical sample (N = 82) of patients with depression and/or anxiety participating in randomized controlled trial of Internet-based affect-focused treatment, and a university student sample (N = 197). The internal consistency for the total score was satisfactory (Clinical sample α = 0.88/Student sample α = 0.84) as well as for all the affective domains, except Anger/Assertion (α = 0.44/0.36), Sadness/Grief (α = 0.24/0.46) and Attachment/Closeness (α = 0.67/0.69). Test retest reliability was satisfactory (ICC > 0.77) for the total score and for all the affective domains except for Sadness/Grief (ICC = 0.04). The exploratory factor analysis resulted in a six-factor solution and did only moderately match the test's original affective domains. An empirical cut-off between the clinical and the university student sample were calculated and yielded a cut-off of 72 points. As expected, the Affect Phobia test showed negative significant correlations in the clinical group with measures on depression (rxy  = -0.229; p < 0.01) and anxiety (rxy  = -0.315; p < 0.05). The conclusion is that the psychometric properties are satisfactory for the total score of the Affect Phobia Test but not for some of the test's affective domains. Consequently the domains should not be used as subscales. The test can discriminate between individuals who seek help for psychological problems and those who do not.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Computer Science 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 30%