You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-20836-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James S. Clark, Robert Andrus, Melaine Aubry-Kientz, Yves Bergeron, Michal Bogdziewicz, Don C. Bragg, Dale Brockway, Natalie L. Cleavitt, Susan Cohen, Benoit Courbaud, Robert Daley, Adrian J. Das, Michael Dietze, Timothy J. Fahey, Istem Fer, Jerry F. Franklin, Catherine A. Gehring, Gregory S. Gilbert, Cathryn H. Greenberg, Qinfeng Guo, Janneke HilleRisLambers, Ines Ibanez, Jill Johnstone, Christopher L. Kilner, Johannes Knops, Walter D. Koenig, Georges Kunstler, Jalene M. LaMontagne, Kristin L. Legg, Jordan Luongo, James A. Lutz, Diana Macias, Eliot J. B. McIntire, Yassine Messaoud, Christopher M. Moore, Emily Moran, Jonathan A. Myers, Orrin B. Myers, Chase Nunez, Robert Parmenter, Sam Pearse, Scott Pearson, Renata Poulton-Kamakura, Ethan Ready, Miranda D. Redmond, Chantal D. Reid, Kyle C. Rodman, C. Lane Scher, William H. Schlesinger, Amanda M. Schwantes, Erin Shanahan, Shubhi Sharma, Michael A. Steele, Nathan L. Stephenson, Samantha Sutton, Jennifer J. Swenson, Margaret Swift, Thomas T. Veblen, Amy V. Whipple, Thomas G. Whitham, Andreas P. Wion, Kai Zhu, Roman Zlotin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 32% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 44 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 47 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 46 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 39 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#262,748
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#3,822
of 58,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,059
of 453,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#161
of 1,869 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,869 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.