↓ Skip to main content

Physiology of difficult rock climbing

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Physiology of difficult rock climbing
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00421-003-1036-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip B. Watts

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to explore existing research on the physiological aspects of difficult rock climbing. Findings will be categorized into the areas of an athlete profile and an activity model. An objective here is to describe high-level climbing performance; thus the focus will primarily be on studies that involve performances at the 5.11/6c (YDS/French) level of difficulty or higher. Studies have found climbers to be small in stature with low body mass and low body fat. Although absolute strength values are not unusual, strength to body mass ratio is high in accomplished climbers. There is evidence that muscular endurance and high upper body power are important. Climbers do not typically possess extremely high aerobic power, typically averaging between 52-55 ml.kg(-1).min(-1) for maximum oxygen uptake. Performance time for a typical ascent ranges from 2 to 7 min and oxygen uptake (VO2) averages around 20-25 ml.kg(-1).min(-1) over this period. Peaks of over 30 ml.kg(-1).min(-1) for VO2 have been reported. VO2 tends to plateau during sustained climbing yet remains elevated into the post-climb recovery period. Blood lactate accumulates during ascent and remains elevated for over 20 min post-climbing. Handgrip endurance decreases to a greater degree than handgrip strength with severe climbing. On the basis of this review, it appears that a specific training program for high-level climbing would include components for developing high, though not elite-level, aerobic power; specific muscular strength and endurance; ATP-PC and anaerobic glycolysis system power and capacity; and some minimum range of motion for leg and arm movements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 413 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 86 20%
Student > Master 79 19%
Researcher 40 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 9%
Other 17 4%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 103 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 157 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 5%
Engineering 15 4%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 113 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,824
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,498
of 62,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.