↓ Skip to main content

Genetic associations in diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetic associations in diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis
Published in
Diabetologia, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00125-010-1996-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. L. Mooyaart, E. J. J. Valk, L. A. van Es, J. A. Bruijn, E. de Heer, B. I. Freedman, O. M. Dekkers, H. J. Baelde

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Ireland 2 1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#3,199
of 5,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,924
of 195,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#17
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.